Monday, April 23, 2012

Retailer Whole Foods Weighs in on the FDA's NDI, back in 2011

http://www.wholefoodsmagazine.com/supplements/features/regulatory-update-2011
Food Safety Modernization Act passed into law in January of last year.  Below is a very good summary of the retailer business, Whole Foods, concerns about the new regulations covered in the new law:

·         Registration with FDA was once per life, now every 2 years

·         How to prove a product was on the market prior to 1994 since there's no list

·         What if an ingredient was on the market before 1994, but is now being extracted through new technology

·         Ingredient suppliers not exempt from Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) practices in their facilities, creating more costs

·         Vulnerability assessments will be conducted and regulations be issued to protect against the intentional adulteration of food in such categories as weight loss, sexual enhancement, and body building

·         Gives FDA some additional recall authority and the ability to collect fees for re-inspection, from car mileage to overhead costs, plus no strict definition of "re-inspection," which could be considered anywhere from weeks to decades as it stands now

·         If there is ever a government shut-down, due to a debt ceiling deadline being missed, there would be funding issues on how much the FDA would be allowed to do

·         2009, the Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3s (GOED), Salt Lake City, UT, and 10 other organizations submitted a citizen’s petition to the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) asking for a panel to review the data on the health benefits of omega-3s now that the report on Vitamin D has been published--IOM is studying the review process itself, not sure whether they will eventually choose EPA/DHA or choose choline as the next nutrient to study--takes 2 years for a report to be established once the study is completed

·         Messages have been very mixed about what makes an acceptable health claim since the FTC has indicated that 2 human studies are sufficient to support a claim, and other times indicating it has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis; the FTC recently asked some companies to sign consent decrees saying they can’t make future claims without first having two independent double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials and having pre-approval from FDA for any health claims. This is despite the fact that FTC doesn’t formally require such FDA pre-approval under the law. So far, two companies have been served this order, but the industry is concerned that this is becoming a de facto standard

·         Confusion on Codex standard for fish oils vs. marine oils

·         FDA cracking down faster on more illegal, tainted products out of legitimate dietary supplement industry, sending message to criminals that their drug spiking is being watched more closely

·         Good Manufacturing Practice Watch (GMP's) increased by FDA, giving a pattern of the FDA's priorities for these inspections, but not sure how it will continue based on the debt ceiling funding

·         There are strong scientific data that in a very short period of time—three to five years—organic crops will be tainted with GMO pollen, causing problems for both the organic farmers and the consumers

·         In other news, the USDA recently deregulated some genetically modified organisms (GMOs); now GMO sugar beets, alfalfa and feed corn can be planted. The concern is that as crops get deregulated to use GMOs and to plant GMO crops, the inadvertent contamination of organic crops then becomes an enormous problem for farms—which then becomes an enormous problem for retailers--At this time, the only recourse for the industry may be litigation, such a lawsuit would not be raised by the OTA, but by others concerned about the threat to organic crops. Unfortunately, there may be upwards of 20 potential GMO crops that may be deregulated

No comments:

Post a Comment