Thursday, June 28, 2012

Vaccine News - Swine Flu and Mumps

1.) Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Original Web link source for below article:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/47851.htm

"This is huge breaking news in the vaccine industry: According to two former Merck virologists, Merck faked its mumps vaccine test data for over a decade in order to deceive the government and the public -- and it even contributed to mumps outbreaks! A lawsuit has now been filed against Merck, claiming, among other shocking things:
"[Merck] engaged in a decade-long scheme to falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its vaccine...
"incorporating the use of animal antibodies to artificially inflate the results..."...destroying evidence of the falsified data and then lying to an FDA investigator..."...threatened a virologist in Merck's vaccine division with jail if he reported the fraud to the FDA..."

Read more in this stunning report on Merck and the mumps vaccine:
http://www.naturalnews.com/036328_Merck_mumps_vaccine_False_Claims_Act.html

2.) Swine flu likely claimed quarter of a million lives: study

Mon, 25 Jun, 2012

3.) Where are all the dead bodies from swine flu? CDC's new estimates of half a million dead prove too comedic to ignore

Wednesday, June 27, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger


"...somehow, we all missed those 500,000 dead bodies in 2009, which would have overflowed from the morgues, filled local gymnasiums and been found dropping dead across our streets. If 500,000+ people died from swine flu, modern cities would have been littered with dead bodies like something from a war scene. After all, the entire Vietnam War killed roughly 50,000 Americans, and the CDC is claiming swine flu killed ten times as many people.
"...don't recall any pictures in the news of bodies stacking up anywhere. No reports of morgues overflowing with dead people. No mass graves. No footage from the TV news showing the horrors of stacked body bags. None of that ever happened!"


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036317_CDC_Swine_Flu_death_estimates.html#ixzz1z8m1YUT1

Dr. Douglass II, M.D. - Comments on Supreme Court Ruling


Supreme Court ruling puts the Nanny State in control

Bolshevik!

Pardon my Russian, but that's the only way to put it now that General Secretary Barack Obama's grand socialist experiment is the confirmed law of the land.

Thanks to this morning's Supreme Court ruling, you can kiss whatever's left of your health freedom goodbye as Washington pinkos can now force you to pony up top rubles for a health care system that's about to get even worse than it is now.

And believe me, if you think it's bad now... you ain't seen nothing yet!
ObamaCare will cost us at least an extra $1.76 trillion -- trillion with a T -- over the next decade. You know the massive Spanish bailout that's also making headlines this week? That $1.76 trillion would pay for it 14 times over!

In return for shelling out all that money you'll get... well... you'll get the government increasing your premiums and lowering standards.

The system adds 30 million new patients to the same healthcare system we have now -- at your expense -- without doing a thing to increase the number of doctors in the country.

The Soviets had breadlines that stretched for blocks. You'll have lines like that at your doctor's office.

Don't think for a minute that this will change based on who's elected this autumn -- especially since Mitt Romney actually created the program that ObamaCare was based on.

But for you personally, there's an "out" that doesn't involve leaving the country (although, let's face facts here, that might not be a bad option either).

You see, if you opt out of ObamaCare and choose no Nanny State insurance at all, you're supposed to pay a fine to the IRS. But Congress neglected to give the IRS the power to actually collect that fine.

In other words, if you refuse to pay, the IRS can't as of now file a lien or bring criminal charges against you for the money. Expect a fair amount of bullying and plenty of time in court -- but there's not a word in the 2,700-page law that says they can actually force you to cough up that dough.


Leaked emails expose the real ObamaCare powers
When the government seizes control of an industry -- any industry, I don't care what it is -- it's never about the "good of the people."

Sure, those are the noises they'll make. But it's really just about expanding the government's power over its people and rewarding those who help them keep that power -- and punishing those who don't play ball.

And there's no better example of this Creeping Cronyism than ObamaCare.

Newly surfaced emails show that despite General Secretary Obama's promises of an open and public debate, the usual wheeling and dealing took place behind the scenes.

You know how that works: Whoever writes the big checks holds all the cards -- and when it comes to healthcare, no one writes bigger checks than Big Pharma.

So the drug industry paid $70 million to front two pro-ObamaCare Astroturf campaigns and $150 million in pro-ObamaCare TV ads that were coordinated with the White House to pressure on-the-fence lawmakers into toeing the line.

It worked, too.

Now, you know Big Pharma didn't write those checks because they believe in the dream of universal healthcare, and they certainly didn't do it because they like the guy. No, they spent those millions to get some $20 billion in savings from ObamaCare rules, such as protection from "re-importation."

That's when drugs are bought overseas at lower prices than what the drug companies charge here, and then resold to American consumers at a saving.

In many ways, it's the ultimate global free-market move, and it was supposed to be a key cost-saving measure in ObamaCare.

Instead, it's not even up for discussion.

The newly released emails are an outrage and affront to whatever remains of our tattered democracy. But there's one part I can't help but laugh at -- and that's the American Medical Association's sad attempts to get a seat at the ObamaCare table.

They wanted to make sure their doctors would get paid more, or at least not get paid less through shrinking Medicare reimbursements.

But since they only offered to kick in a measly $2 million, they couldn't even get anyone to return their phone calls.

Supreme Court Ruling - Mandate & Penalty Are Both Taxes!

Supreme Court's Obamacare decision hands federal government unlimited power to force you to spend 100% of your paycheck on things you don't even want


Thursday, June 28, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036329_Obamacare_Supreme_Court_economic_freedom.html#ixzz1z7zwiE7B
 
"...the government can force Americans to buy anything it wants by simply characterizing the forced payment as a 'tax...'

"...the U.S. government can (and will) create new mandates that, for example, would force Americans to buy all the following:" (Note from Ken: As mentioned, Americans could be forced to buy items not wanted or needed--here's a potential example list that is included in this article):

• A new car each year from Detroit, in order to "boost the U.S. auto industry."
• War bonds to "support the war effort."
• A year's supply of vaccines.
• Life insurance from the government's "approved" sources.
• Lawn fertilizer (the "lawn health care mandate").
• Intellectual property such as patented human genes already in your body.

"There is no limit to the reach of the Supreme Court's wild misinterpretation of the Commerce Clause, it seems. So now, all Americans can expect to get ready for the federal government to start laying out a long list of products and services we will all be taxed into buying from the crony capitalist buddies of those in power...

"Perhaps the worst side effect is that Obamacare isn't really about health care at all. It's about protecting a Big Pharma monopoly over medicine; forcing consumers to buy into a system that offers zero coverage for alternative medicine, nutritional therapies, natural remedies or the healing arts...
 
"...the Obamacare system excludes natural medicine. There is no freedom to choose nutritional therapies, herbal remedies, naturopathic medicine or the Healing Arts. The entire system is focused on drugs, surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. It's a Big Pharma monopoly that we are now forced to buy into...
 
"Note, carefully, there is NO LIMIT to this "taxing" power. If you bring home a monthly paycheck of, for example, $3,000, the U.S. government can now mandate that you spend $2,999 of that on various products and services that it deems you must have "for your own protection." You no longer control your own take-home pay! The government can force you to spend it on things you don't want or even need!

"America, it seems, is starting to sound a whole lot like England under King George. Soon, we'll be living under our own modern Stamp Act from 1765, which eventually led to the American Revolution. Learn your history! As Wikipedia explains: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamp_Act_1765)"
 
"The Stamp Act 1765 (short title Duties in American Colonies Act 1765; 5 George III, c. 12) was a direct tax imposed by the British Parliament specifically on the colonies of British America. The act required that many printed materials in the colonies be produced on stamped paper produced in London, carrying an embossed revenue stamp. These printed materials were legal documents, magazines, newspapers and many other types of paper used throughout the colonies. Like previous taxes, the stamp tax had to be paid in valid British currency, not in colonial paper money. The purpose of the tax was to help pay for troops stationed in North America after the British victory in the Seven Years' War. The British government felt that the colonies were the primary beneficiaries of this military presence, and should pay at least a portion of the expense.

"The Stamp Act met great resistance in the colonies. The colonies sent no representatives to Parliament, and therefore had no influence over what taxes were raised, how they were levied, or how they would be spent. Many colonists considered it a violation of their rights as Englishmen to be taxed without their consent -- consent that only the colonial legislatures could grant. Colonial assemblies sent petitions and protests. The Stamp Act Congress held in New York City, reflecting the first significant joint colonial response to any British measure, also petitioned Parliament and the King. Local protest groups, led by colonial merchants and landowners, established connections through correspondence that created a loose coalition that extended from New England to Georgia. Protests and demonstrations initiated by the Sons of Liberty often turned violent and destructive as the masses became involved. Very soon all stamp tax distributors were intimidated into resigning their commissions, and the tax was never effectively collected.

"Opposition to the Stamp Act was not limited to the colonies. British merchants and manufacturers, whose exports to the colonies were threatened by colonial economic problems exacerbated by the tax, also pressured Parliament. The Act was repealed on March 18, 1766 as a matter of expedience, but Parliament affirmed its power to legislate for the colonies "in all cases whatsoever" by also passing the Declaratory Act. There followed a series of new taxes and regulations, likewise opposed by the colonists.

"The episode played a major role in defining the grievances and enabling the organized colonial resistance that led to the American Revolution in 1775."


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036329_Obamacare_Supreme_Court_economic_freedom.html#ixzz1z83lhDqw

 

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Attack on Vit. D3 - "USA Today" Misquotes Study

Panel to postmenopausal women: Don't take vitamin D, calcium

USA TODAY
Updated 6/12/2012
"...the study covered in the article only mentions that postmenopausal women shouldn't take low-doses of vitamin D combined with calcium. According to the U.S. government a "low dose" is something around 200 IUs daily -- a virtually useless quantity of vitamin D. Most nutritionists recommend 4,000 IUs daily or even more.

"So what the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force really determined is that taking a ridiculously low dose of vitamin D isn't very helpful to your health. The logical conclusion from this is that people should take HIGHER doses of vitamin D which have, through hundreds of studies, been shown to help prevent cancer, increase bone mineral density, prevent kidney disease and so on...
"...the accurate headline in USA Today, if the paper actually were interested in educating and informing readers about nutrition, would be, "Postmenopausal women need higher doses of vitamin D." But instead, the headline read, "Don't take vitamin D, calcium."
With this kind of dis-information being reported, it could easily lead to the FDA banning Vitamin D3 for use in pharmaceutical drugs by prescription only.  Could this be what they're intending to do down the road?  The FDA banned stevia, an herbal sweetener, for decades while raiding manufacturers, taking their inventory, and even destroying cookbooks that mentioned stevia in the recipe.  And everybody knows about the FDA criminalizing ephedra.  And more recently, the FDA has been going after raw milk.
Mainstream media already "reported" last winter that Vitamin E could increase prostate cancer http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/11/8273189-more-bad-supplement-news-vitamin-e-may-be-risky-for-prostate?lite---then it was learned they were talking about SYNTHETIC Vitamin E, chemically-made by man, not from nature, not from whole foods, not from dietary supplements that meet the FDA standards!  http://www.lef.org/featured-articles/INFEML_Rebuttal_E_1018.htm

Monday, June 25, 2012

FDA said "No," but FTC says it's OK

Why Is Big Corn Continuing to Run ‘Corn Sugar’ TV Ads Even After FDA Denial?

June 25 2012

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/06/25/fructose-on-corn-sugar.aspx?e_cid=20120625_DNL_artNew_2

FDA rejected the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) request to re-label High Fructose Corn Syrup to "corn sugar," but you're still seeing the TV ads saying "corn sugar and cane sugar are the same, and the body can't tell the difference" -- Why?  "...The claim that all sugars are metabolized by your body in the same way is an outdated belief that has been shattered in more recent years by a growing body of scientific research,..."

"...The Consumerist asked the FTC to comment on the issue, but they refused, saying they would only issue a statement after an investigation had been conducted. But as The Consumerist pointed out, this doesn't necessarily mean they are conducting one on this issue currently, or plan to in the future..."

Saturday, June 23, 2012

FDA Revising NDI Draft - Thanks to Jarrow

International Probiotics Association Excited To Learn The FDA Has Decided To Issue A New, Revised NDI Draft Guidance

International Probiotics Association looking forward to working with FDA to develop proper guidance necessary to deliver safe and effective supplements to consumers

Zurich, Switzerland (PRWEB) June 21, 2012


"The International Probiotics Association (IPA) is delighted that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is taking a second look at the New Dietary Ingredients (NDI) draft guidance,...'This is a huge move forward for the supplement industry, yet there’s still a lot of work to be done,' said Ioannis Misopoulos, director general of the IPA...'We look forward to continuing our work with the FDA to further develop the proper guidance necessary to deliver safe and effective supplements to consumers. And in the meantime, we applaud the successful efforts of industry leaders, in particular Jarrow Formulas for their diligent work and guidance,' continued Misopoulos."

Read complete article at above web link - gives description of who the IPA is and what they do.










Tuesday, June 19, 2012

New Development on the FDA's NDI

June 19, 2012

Jarrow Formulas has raised its concerns about the FDA’s draft guidance on new dietary ingredients (NDIs) with House Speaker John Boehner as part of its campaign to alert members of Congress to the dangers the “fatally flawed” document presents to the supplements trade.

This is more about increased abuse instead of the usual...

This isn't about economics or politics (although there may be a little of both behind the scenes), but it's more about abuse--physical, mental, emotional abuse, and yes, even spiritual abuse.  It's called child molesting and other titles, and it's increasing.  Why?

Utah news reports in 2010 said that 9 out of 10 BYU students were addicted to pornography--this included return missionaries, male and female students.  While the LDS Church has repeatedly warned their members to "stop it," it's still increasing, and it's Christianwide, not just within the LDS Church. 

Someone has said that Satan saved poronography for his "best" tool for the very end of the "last days" to derail God's plan, and to take as many bodies with him since he doesn't have a body.  That's called revenge for getting kicked out of Heaven, right?  But WHY, or better yet, HOW is pornography addiction increasing?  

Here's one staff member's personal experience about it, and what she recently wrote on a comment blog, hoping the info will assist others into knowing WHY it's bad and what it can do to you:

"Because of two child molesting cases in the Pennsylvania news recently, and because the court battle centered on diagnosing one of them (Sandusky, PA Univ. coach) with 'Histrionic personality disorder,' potentially getting him off easier on the final sentence, and the journalists joking with each other on live feed during the trial today about the wife knowing nothing, here's my take on it from personal experience >>>



"Ex-spouse molested our son, psychiatrist eval. was that he was a sociopath/psychopath & addicted to porn; said these cases are that they are molested themselves, recruited through porn, or both. He said there are 5 stages of porn addiction AND it changes brain chemistry just like drugs/alcohol changes brain chemistry: 1) viewing leads to experimenting, 2) beastology, 3) child porn leads to stalking children for molesting, 4) experiment with same-gender "attraction" that's prevalent in porn, leading to homosexuality, 5) bondage (whips, chains) leads to "snuff" films with simulated rape or murder which ends in real murder because none of the other stages of addiction can offer the sexual "high" any more. Yeah, learned more about it than I ever wanted to know.

Can get over it, but only with professional rehab, just like drugs/alcohol, AND having the desire to get over it.(My ex had no desire)Heard Dr. Laura on radio once state the ONLY thing that helps the victims is if the perp turns himself/herself (yes, it's both) in and refuses any "deals," taking the full brunt for their actions, because until then the victim can't heal, have assumed it's their fault and that they, the victim, is the "bad guy," but if the perp takes full responsibility for their actions by publicly confessing to being the "bad guy" and demand the full consequences, Dr. Laura stated that only then can the victim heal.The Judge (60-120 yrs. life sentence) did the RIGHT thing--now make sure the parole board doesn't let him loose based on "crowded conditions" or "good behavior," some other excuse.

And yes, it IS possible for the wife not to know because they go to great lengths to hide it until they're caught--in our case, my ex was unemployed a lot, with my being the breadwinner and he being "Mr. Mom," until one day I walked in on him molesting our son, with my child crying and screaming, "No, Daddy, no, Daddy!" Asked ex-spouse-to-be what he was doing, he laughed, grabbed my 2-1/2 yr. old and wrapped a bath towel around his little naked body and carried him out of the room, hugging and holding him in the living room, assuring him that he'd done the right thing to refuse, and that he did not have to do anything Daddy was asking him to do like that any more, then called the psychiatrist marriage counselor (Yes, should've called police right at that time, because within hours he was lying his face off, his word against mine of what I'd witnessed).  Divorce lawyer said only the multiple adulteries and the one choking event could be used in divorce, but the molesting couldn't be used in court for the divorce because too many women were using this as a false accusation that never happened just to get a divorce, and judges were ruling in favor of the abuser. Did tell me to have things packed on the day the divorce would be heard in court, and move out of state that same day to protect my child from further abuse, that filing charges would cause SRS to be involved with "supervised visits" that would cause the child more emotional-mental-spiritual harm which would not allow any healing, and to get ahead of the ex-spouse's intention to file court papers that would not allow the child to ever leave the state for any reason (family, vacation, advanced scout field trips, etc.)

Child, age 3 after divorce, role-played the events, then would clam up and not talk about it--many counselors repeatedly stated this meant the child had been threatened with death or death to Mommy, or both, if ever told, so child became creative in role-playing it so that it wouldn't be considered as "telling" anybody. Child lost memory of it, as far as known, but kept the very low self-esteem and self-worth (2 different traits) that Dr. Laura talked about. Warned by psychiatrist to never demonize the ex-spouse in front of child, or child would reject himself and gender. Also warned that the potential was there that my child could, not would but Could, end up abusing his own children when they reached the same age that he was when he'd been abused. Paid lots of money on counselors and tutors to help my child grow up with whatever was needed to help him be free of that nightmarish ghost.

Age 14, out of rebellious anger one night, child went up on roof one winter night "to sleep" for couple of hours, then came back for help with frost bite after I'd been searching everywhere but the roof--ER at hospital labeled it as attempted suicide and required 90-days observation in mental ward of hospital, or face the consequences of having him removed from my home and care permanently. Very loving Bishop, and a ward member who worked as a psychologist at the hospital, were most helpful. Hospital announced foster care would be next if not healed, and my child began dumping all 'worries' and 'concerns' on them, was considered healed at end of 90-days, came home.  (At this time, child also wanted to know why birthparents gave him up for adoption, and the adoption agency was able to supply letters that the birthmother wrote, at the time of the birth and again a couple of years later, giving the reason on the first as both were in the military and did not plan to get married, and thanking the agency for helping her start a whole new life on the second one--including becoming LDS herself--and hoping her baby has a whole new life and is happy, too. This still gives me guilt, not only that it happened on my watch (which caused me to be wary and decide not to date or re-marry again until I'd finished doing my job of raising my son, getting a master's degree in behavior disorders along the way for better income---had tried a short 7-month re-marriage to someone who was a new LDS convert in name only while going back to his prior abusive "free" lifestyle, although to his credit he did adopt my son to get rid of the first loser because in his book molesting a child was the epitome of  all crimes--oddly enough both ex-spouses told the divorce judge a heartfelt statement that I'd been a good wife to them, we just didn't agree on lifestyle), but it also happened after she, the birthmother, had given total faith and trust that the new parents would take care of her baby.  Can't wait to meet her on the other side of the veil, if that's the only time available, and give her a hug of thanks--her "mistake" became my blessing since I couldn't give birth, and I recognize how hard it was for her to make the adoption decision. The letters gave us peace.)

One psychiatrist from hospital stayed in touch to maintain a "father figure" my son could telephone and dump on at any time, even after the psychiatrist relocated to another hospital out-of-state, coaching me to be 'just the Mom' who listens and always stands by my son, never to let the school or anyone else pull me into 'their side' that's against my son, with the school being ordered by the psychiatrist to call him when there was any 'incident' between them and my son. The abusive high school teachers finally gave up when the high school principal joined with the psychiatrist's side and my son's side of any issue where they had provoked my son into tears and anger with their hostile rejection of him and inflammatory statements about him in front of the class (yes, there are abusive teachers who admit to not liking 'special needs' students in their mainstream classes, no matter how smart or compliant the students are--my child tested in 2nd grade with 165 IQ on a bad day of "behavior" problems, but also tested as 'learning disability'--not inherited from birthparents prior to our adopting him at age 5 days old--ex-spouse claimed to counselor it was "okay to molest our son because he wasn't blood related, and he needed to use him while he experimented on whether he should remain straight, become bi-sexual, or become homosexual," direct quote, so you can tell which stage of porno addiction my ex-spouse was on--the 'learning disability' was not something that could be passed down to my son's children since it came from 2 sources--diagnosed as neurological damage from birthmother being on kidney-dialysis machine during entire 9 months of pregnancy, and diagnosed as severe subconscious trauma damage with stress overload from being molested, and this put him in special needs as the 'primary label' instead of gifted, in spite of his 2nd grade teacher fighting for the gifted class--didn't know at the time that I as the parent had legal rights and could have demanded it with her, or even sue the school district for not listening to her--gifted is considered anything above 120 IQ).

A bully incident in scouts later caused child to leave the campsite to get away from it, and that's when fishing-for-a-badge was discovered to be the outlet that led to a better self-esteem and self-worth that gave him hope and change in life, receiving awards, even some in cash, for best casting at the local Bass Pro Shop (competing with men two and three times his age who verbally stated to us to be in awe of his abilities at such a young age that took them years to perfect!), got his Eagle Scout (project for it was going back to mental hospital and taking teenaged patients--with adult staff--to local lake to teach them fishing as a substitute for drugs--staff commented repeatedly that it was the happiest they'd seen the teenaged patients since entering the hospital; made a how-to video to teach fishing for submitting to a local TV sports show), high school graduation with "B+" average, then Military Police National Guard for 6 years, stating before leaving for boot camp that the decision was made for this military police training so that 'nobody could ever abuse me again.' Had the highest rate of catching shoplifters at a national-chain retail store security job for several years (learned/innate ability to read body language on the store's security cameras), and since then has graduated from a police academy, worked as city law enforcement officer for several years, received life-saving awards, qualified for nomination of Officer of the Year on TV's "America's Most Wanted," now working with private security that has better pay, now has two very intelligent, sweet children and a very nice wife. 

By dedicating my life to my son while he was growing up (although not having enough money at times, just barely enough for only our basic needs at times, thus, reason to earn degree for better job, and not having enough time while earning the master's degree and working multiple jobs since there was never any child support, re-created the feeling of "abandonment" for him that my son has had since birth when given up for adoption), in order to try to make up for what happened, and offer anything and everything that was out there to help that my master's training as a special needs teacher/school counselor could find, I'm hoping it had some influences that can hopefully sustain my son for the rest of his life. I recognized even more after my master's degree training that not all molested victims have this much going for them as an adult, and that they are subject to the cycle of abuse, accompanied with the suicidal-spiral downward their entire life. My son has been diagnosed with PTSD recently, after military and law enforcement experiences, but my gut tells me the root of all his emotional challenges still goes way back to what happened to him as a toddler (or earlier, as per ex-spouse comments to psychiatrist).  Sure, it's easy for others to say 'forgive' the ex-spouse, and I have--just haven't forgotten or given excuses, used the lessons learned from it to help others.  Sad to say, he's never admitted to what he did yet, calling me the liar still, but whether he was a victim as a child to another molester or not, he still continues the porno addiction, and that part he does have control over, just like any other drug/tobacco/alcoholic disease or satanic temptation where you confess and then do whatever it takes to completely forsake."


(Note from staff member:  Sorry, trying to write this without divulging any names or places or any other personal info--as you can see, molesting a child has far-reaching end results, and it all started with pornography--a young woman once said to me that she didn't like the hard porn, that soft porn was okay, but did like, enjoy, and prefer the cartoon porn because it did the same thing as hard and soft porn, but provided more fun and laughter along with it. I had no idea any of that existed, and couldn't tell you what each one of them are, but it just seems to me, personally, that the media tells us all about the "bad stuff" on drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol, but you never hear the media give the details on all the "bad stuff" that goes with pornography!!  And what's the driving force to seek out pornography in the first place??  True, it's thrust upon us from almost every media and advertising source, which changes our brain chemistry to crave it as any other addiction, but what else?  Is it our poor diets, not enough nutrition getting to the brain?  Or physical health problems that keep us from enjoying wholesome activities and relationships?  Or TV "programming" that brainwashes us into seeking "reality" behind closed curtains with porno celebrities that make us feel good? 


BEWARE of ANY pornography, and no matter which stage of addiction, get professional help ASAP. TV and movies are putting "soft" porn into almost everything now, so we've gone so far as to get rid of our TV ("we" being my new husband of 16 years--with no track record of womanizing, child molesting, pornography, drugs/tobacco/alcohol, etc., as per my many in-depth interviews of all his relatives, friends, customers of his retail business, and church leaders while dating, hand-holding and research only before the first kiss, plus I'd spent many years and counselors getting myself ready for the "right one," also--to get rid of that "All losers check in here for a gullible date" neon-sign that seemed to be on my own forehead), and it's amazing how soon you come out of the hypnotizing, brainwashing, programming that we all subject ourselves to with the addictive TV after getting through the withdrawal symptoms!  The "Salt Lake Tribune" in August or September of 2000 had article quoting Hollywood as bragging that TV would have "X" rated TV shows during prime time viewing within the next 10 years.  Well, we're there, folks!  And remember, the professional help needs to know that porn is bad, since they could be addicted to it themselves, and see nothing wrong with it. Listen to the warnings. God needs you to be fully awake and aware of what's out there in the cold-cruel-Babylon-world, in order to take care of yourself and your family, in order to be in His 'new army of stripling warriors' that He's called for back in 2002 to take on Satan [LDS Gen. Conf., Elder L. Tom Perry], in order to assist in building His kingdom, and best of all, in order to return to Him. Tell Satan to go take a hike you-know-where all by himself, that he's not getting your mind or your body, and you're not going there with him!  If you're reading this, that means you have a body, therefore, that means you passed the "tests" in the pre-existence to qualify to come to Earth to get a body, and means you were on the winning side of the War in Heaven.  It's also proof that you didn't allow yourself to be suckered into Satan's web then, so don't let yourself get suckedered into it now!)



http://www.ydr.com/crime/ci_20885192/experts-cast-doubt-sanduskys-disorder-defense



Saturday, June 16, 2012

New Hampshire FIRST on Fluoride Warning!! (as per FAN's report)


On August 4th, 2012, the state of New Hampshire will become the first state to require fluoridating communities to warn their citizens about the fluorosis risk the additive poses to infants.
This past week, Governor John Lynch signed HB1416, "an act relative to a required fluoride statement." The law will require the following notice on all consumer confidence reports, which must be mailed to all water consumers, be posted online, and available at city halls:
"Your public water supply is fluoridated. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, if your child under the age of 6 months is exclusively consuming infant formula reconstituted with fluoridated water, there may be an increased chance of dental fluorosis. Consult your child's health care provider for more information."
This new law is a proactive approach to reducing NH fluorosis rates by notifying parents about the risk posed to their infants by fluoridated water...This marks a point when the State of New Hampshire has officially recognized that fluoridated water poses a risk to NH infants; a risk backed up by countless studies and a growing fluorosis epidemic that afflicts 41% of U.S. adolescents.
Even with this strong opposition from the well-financed dental lobby, the bill was still passed by the NH House by a vote of 253-23, and passed unanimously by the NH Senate. HB-1416 was also signed quickly by Governor John Lynch, rather than being approved without his signature, showing his strong support for this action.
Recently at the state level, two bills were introduced in NH calling for a prohibition of fluoridation...as well as Illinois and Tennessee. Vermont and Florida's attempts to mandate fluoridation has died, and New Jersey's attempt has stalled.
4 cities just recently voted fluoridation out of their city's drinking water, and they are: Pevely, Missouri (to save the city money)--Bassett, Nebraska (population of 636 voted it out at county elections)--Churchill, Manitoba (Canada) [town council voted it out after petition signed by citizens]--Argos, Indiana (town council voted it out on bidding of the city's water superintendent worried about health risks and city expenses).
Other cities with upcoming fluoride hearings, or city committee studying the issue, are: New York City, Milwaukee, Phoenix, Sante Fe, and Anchorage.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

More from Step #4--Suze Orman's Book

("The 9 Steps to Financial Freedom"--continued)

Step #4  – Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care
Stroke?  Ski accident?  Put on life support with no chance of survival?  If you don’t decide now, somebody else could decide what should happen for you later about taking you off life support, and with high medical and hospitalization costs, once the maximum of health insurance is gone (average limit is $1 million), your relatives have to pay the rest that will keep piling up.  
There are 3 basic options:
1.  Prolong your life no matter what the cost and no matter what the condition, leaving expenses to relatives
2.  Prolong your life unless in a coma or ongoing vegetative state, with 2 doctors making final decision
3.  Do not prolong life at all unless complete physical and mental restoration is possible
Name a loved one who you know loves you and is strong in making such a tough decision to be the “agent” in making any final decisions about your life, and then name two alternatives as “co-agents” in case the main person is not available for some reason.
A living will can give your wishes about life support, but it does not appoint someone to make any final decisions, which means the doctors will have to do it.  Not even the living trust can do this.  The durable power of attorney for health care takes care of it all.  A living will, a living trust, and the durable power of attorney for health care are three separate documents.  All hospitals have the form free of charge, plus your attorney who is doing your trust and will can also take care of this at the same time.  Don’t put it off—when you need it, it’ll be too late to create it.
Step #4:  Life Insurance
Original purpose in having life insurance was for the young breadwinner dying early and unexpectedly without any money to leave his/her family.  If you outlive the policy purpose, then usually that means you’ve accumulated enough assets to take care of the family and don’t need it.  Huge industry in selling life insurance because the agent you bought it from earns 80% to 90% of the first year’s premium!  For that reason, you need to figure out how much you want for a comfort level for yourself if you outlive the policy and do not wish to work any more, or can’t work any more, as well as how much you want for your loved ones if you die.  You need to go back to your monthly expenses done in Step #3, to see how much money goes out and how much money comes in, and then use this formula: 
Rule of Thumb Formula for Life Insurance >>  $100,000 for every $500 of monthly income required.
Example:  $3,000 needed to cover all household expenses per month divided by $500 = 6 x $100,000 = $600,000 life insurance.
Or perhaps you only need $1,500 per month to cover some of the expenses (after adding it to your salary), so use the same formula above >> $1,500 divided by $500 = 3 x $100,000 = $300,000.
How long do you need life insurance?  If you’ve followed the steps outlined, you should have enough retirement benefits to support you and your loved ones after you’re gone.  Bottom line, by the time you’re 65 at the latest, there should be no need for life insurance.  If you choose life insurance, the best to get is term life insurance, which is considered a “just-in-case” policy.  The industry knows you have relatively little chance of dying before the policy expires which excludes them from paying any death benefit, so these are not expensive at all.  With whole life or universal life, they know they will have to pay, so it’s priced accordingly.  The only advantage to whole and universal life is the cash value that you can cash in, or borrow from, during emergencies.  Just remember the commission is the most lucrative of any business, and you’re the one paying it.  If you just want to put money aside, there are far, far better ways to save it without paying the commissions.
Step #4: Long-Term Care Insurance
If you’re 50 or older, same as fire insurance or car insurance, you need long-term care insurance (LTC) for future years that you and your spouse, or your parents, may need a nursing home (fire insurance, 1 in 1,200 use it; car insurance, 1 in 240 use it; long-term care insurance, 1 in 2 use it).  No health insurance policy covers nursing homes, and there are limits and regulations to how many times you can stay in the hospital before Medicare kicks in for only a small percentage of the overall expenses, causing nursing home care expenses to relatives after all assets have been sold.  It's now considered as a criminal offense to hide/transfer assets to qualify for Medicaid.  The price of the LTC policy goes up as your age goes up.  Average cost of nursing homes 30 years from the date of this book, 1998, is projected to be $13,000 per month, as opposed to average cost for good nursing homes in the year 2000 being $4,500 per month in some areas, and $100,000 per year in major cities--rule of thumb, the longer you wait, the more it will cost (once in use, no more premiums are paid).  Consumer Reports rated LTC insurance carriers, and the one they'd ranked as #1 has gone bankrupt before the magazine hit the news stands, so have to choose one that's in the LTC business for the long haul.  Suze gives a list of questions to ask the company about it's history and future plans, as well as questions to ask about their policy.  Calculate precisely if you can afford it after you're retired with no money coming in.

Monday, June 4, 2012

one DSHEA victory plus one DSHEA loss

Congress votes down Sen. Durbin's anti-supplement amendment, as well as Sen. Paul's
freedom of health speech amendment

May 24, 2012
http://www.naturalnews.com/035976_Dick_Durbin_supplements_Senate.html

(NaturalNews) A sneaky, eleventh-hour attempt by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) to essentially shut down the supplement industry alongside an amendment pertaining to prescription drug user fees has failed. In a vote of 77-20, the U.S. Senate voted to table Amendment No. 2127, which would have created "duplicative, unnecessary, and unexpected new regulations" for the supplement industry that could have resulted in many common supplements being pulled from store shelves.

To the surprise of the entire natural health community, the unveiling of Amdt. No 2127 came late Tuesday afternoon, according to the Natural Products Insider (NPI), just one day before the bill to which it was attached, S. 3187, the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, was set for a vote. But because the natural health community immediately sprung into action to oppose Amdt. No 2127, it was successfully defeated.

"(Amdt. No 2127 is) based on the misguided presumption that the current regulatory framework for dietary supplements is flawed and that the FDA lacks authority to regulate these products," said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Ut.) on the Senate Floor, in opposition to the amendment. He added that the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) already provisions the FDA with the tools it needs to properly regulate supplements, and that Amdt. No 2127 only "serves to punish all responsible companies with its overreaching mandates."

Amdt. No 2127 would have unnecessarily required all manufacturers of dietary supplements to register them with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within 30 days, even though Title III of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 already requires registration. This 30-day requirement, in other words, was designed to be impossible for supplement companies to comply with, which would have resulted in many of them simply being pulled from the market.

According to the U.S. Senate's Legislation & Records voting page (http://www.senate.gov), the 20 U.S. Senators that voted against tabling this heinous attack on the supplement industry were:

Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ar.)
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Ca.)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.)
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Il.)
Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.)
Sen. Al Franken (D-Mn.)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Mn.)
Sen. Claire McCaskil (D-Mo.)
Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mt.)
Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.)
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.)
Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.)
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nv.)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Sen. John "Jack" Reed (D-R.I.)
Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
Sen. Bernard "Bernie" Sanders (I-Vt.)
Sen. John "Jay" Rockefeller (D-W.V.)

Senate also votes down Sen. Rand's amendment to reign in FDA, restore freedom of health speech

While it is great news that the Senate was smart enough to reject Sen. Durbin's flagrant assault on the supplement industry, this same Senate voted to reject an amendment proposed by Sen. Rand Paul that would have stopped the FDA from bullying farmers and abusing its power. It also would have restored freedom of health speech by stopping the FDA from censoring the truthful health claims of dietary supplements.

You can read Sen. Paul's press release announcement about his amendment here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/035966_Rand_Paul_FDA_censorship.html

According to the vote tally, the following 78 U.S. Senators voted against Sen. Paul's amendment to stop FDA tyranny and restore freedom of health speech:

Sen. Mark Begich (D-Ak.)
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ak.)
Sen. Jefferson "Jeff" Sessions (R-Al.)
Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Al.)
Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ar.)
Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Az.)
Sen. John McCain (R-Az.)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.)
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Co.)
Sen. Mark Udall (D-Co.)
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Ct.)
Sen. Thomas Carper (D-De.)
Sen. Chris Coons (D-De.)
Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fl.)
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fl.)
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.)
Sen. John "Johnny" Isakson (R-Ga.)
Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hi.)
Sen. Charles "Chuck" Grassley (R-Ia.)
Sen. Thomas "Tom" Harkin (D-Ia.)
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Il.)
Sen. Daniel Coats (R-In.)
Sen. Richard Lugar (R-In.)
Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Ks.)
Sen. Pat Robers (R-Ks.)
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)
Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.)
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Ma.)
Sen. John Kerry (D-Ma.)
Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.)
Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.)
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Me.)
Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Me.)
Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mi.)
Sen. Al Franken (D-Mn.)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Mn.)
Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.)
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.)
Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Ms.)
Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mt.)
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mt.)
Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.)
Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.)
Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.)
Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.)
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Ne.)
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.)
Sen. Robert "Bob" Menendez (D-N.J.)
Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.)
Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.)
Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nv.)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.)
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Oh.)
Sen. Robert "Bob" Portman (R-Oh.)
Sen. James "Jim" Inhofe (R-Ok.)
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Or.)
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Or.)
Sen. Robert Casey (D-Pa.)
Sen. John "Jack" Reed (D-R.I.)
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.)
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)
Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.)
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tn.)
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tn.)
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Ut.)
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.)
Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
Sen. Bernard "Bernie" Sanders (I-Vt.)
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wa.)
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wa.)
Sen. Herbert "Herb" Kohl (D-Wi.)
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.)
Sen. John "Jay" Rockefeller (D-W.V.)
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wy.)
Sen. Michael Enzi (R-Wy.)

Sources for this article include:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2012/s110

http://www.citizens.org/?p=2990

http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com

http://www.anh-usa.org

http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/senate/2/111





Friday, June 1, 2012

VICTORY!! FDA says NO to "corn sugar"

In A Victory For Consumers, FDA Turns Thumbs Down On “Corn Sugar” Alias For HFCS

  Read entire article from Citizens for Health here:  http://www.citizens.org/?p=3000

"For more than a year now we have been keeping you up-to-date on an underhanded campaign led by the Corn Refiners Association (CRA) to re-brand high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) "corn sugar". The centerpiece of the campaign was the CRA petition to the FDA seeking the agency's endorsement of their effort to dupe consumers...

"That's why we are truly excited to announce that the FDA stood up for the rights of consumers and against big agribusiness, and in a letter to CRA President Audrae Erickson dated yesterday, May 30 stated that “…your petition does not provide sufficient grounds for the agency to authorize ‘corn sugar’ as an alternate common or usual name for HFCS.”    

 
"The CRA will now have to quit referring to high fructose corn syrup, or HFCS, as “corn sugar,” which it has been doing these days at every opportunity, apparently on the assumption that its 2010 petition would ultimately be granted despite the overwhelming opposition of consumers...

"So confident were the corn refiners in the pending approval of their petition, that in a press release issued last week they said, “Transitional co-labeling, such as ‘Corn Sugar (High Fructose Corn Syrup),’ and CRA’s education campaign will ensure consumers are well informed about the name change.”